<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for THE MAGNET IS ALWAYS ON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themagnetisalwayson.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m all for replications and reporting of null results, but what about the bees? by recipe for dog</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/im-all-for-replications-and-reporting-of-null-results-but-what-about-the-bees/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>recipe for dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=455#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>This is dazzling. I&#039;ve reviewed this theory a while back though this is particularly in-depth. Kudos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is dazzling. I&#8217;ve reviewed this theory a while back though this is particularly in-depth. Kudos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by The bucket has a hole in it, let&#8217;s plug it &#124; Abject</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3314</link>
		<dc:creator>The bucket has a hole in it, let&#8217;s plug it &#124; Abject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-3314</guid>
		<description>[...] clear where capital sees the real value in digital media &#8212; in the ownership of the platform. Jason Zevin offers one of the best critiques of the xMOOC phenomenon I&#8217;ve seen, connecting this pattern to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clear where capital sees the real value in digital media &#8212; in the ownership of the platform. Jason Zevin offers one of the best critiques of the xMOOC phenomenon I&#8217;ve seen, connecting this pattern to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if speech is just a gooey, eggy mess all the way down the line? by Susan Nittrouer</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/what-if-speech-is-just-a-gooey-eggy-mess-all-the-way-down-the-line/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Nittrouer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=403#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>This was terrific - just perfect. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was terrific &#8211; just perfect. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Story Behind a Paper &#8211; Part I by THE MAGNET IS ALWAYS ON -- a cognitive neuroscience blog -- Hearing with a foreign accent</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/a-story-behind-a-paper-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>THE MAGNET IS ALWAYS ON -- a cognitive neuroscience blog -- Hearing with a foreign accent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=579#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>[...] I knew I wanted to do cognitive neuroscience from early on in my graduate training&#8220;if you dance for much very longer, you&#8217;ll be known as the boy who&#8217;s always dancing.&#8221;English speakers are so bad at distinguishing Mandarin alveo-palatal fricatives and affricatesnumberofmodelshow we reason about speech based on our experience with text&#8220;seductive allure of brain imaging&#8221;here  /*  */ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I knew I wanted to do cognitive neuroscience from early on in my graduate training&#8220;if you dance for much very longer, you&#8217;ll be known as the boy who&#8217;s always dancing.&#8221;English speakers are so bad at distinguishing Mandarin alveo-palatal fricatives and affricatesnumberofmodelshow we reason about speech based on our experience with text&#8220;seductive allure of brain imaging&#8221;here  /*  */ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Sandra Harriette</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2946</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Harriette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?page_id=13#comment-2946</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is scary and beautiful all at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is scary and beautiful all at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by MOOC &#124; Posthegemony</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>MOOC &#124; Posthegemony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about so-called Massive Online Open Courses. According to the New York Times, 2012 was the year of the MOOC. Come 2013, some of the enthusiasm has died down a little, as people realize it may not be easy to make money out of these things. And there are plenty who are (rightly) critical of all the hoopla in the first place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about so-called Massive Online Open Courses. According to the New York Times, 2012 was the year of the MOOC. Come 2013, some of the enthusiasm has died down a little, as people realize it may not be easy to make money out of these things. And there are plenty who are (rightly) critical of all the hoopla in the first place. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by J Zevin</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>J Zevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>I am with you on students not being forced to subsidize this with tuition money. I think education should be free for everyone. I don&#039;t pretend to have any answers about how to do that. They seemed to manage OK in Canada and the UK for a while, but that&#039;s changing...

As for professors finding &quot;someone willing to pay them to do research and write articles,&quot; this is actually what we spend an enormous amount of time doing. In fact a common complaint among researchers is that we spend as much or more time writing grant proposals to fund research than actually doing research. If teaching were all done by adjuncts or via MOOCs, it would leave everyone in the position that those of us on &quot;soft money,&quot; already endure, i.e., constant pressure to raise funds with no job security. It is not exactly a situation that encourages careful contemplation or slow, laborious work on unpopular topics, but those are just the sorts of things that often produce unheralded breakthroughs, and anyway expand the boundaries of human knowledge. 

As for subsidizing your mechanic&#039;s time working on the hot rod, I am actually OK an indirect form of that called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peterfrase.com/2011/09/the-basic-income-and-the-helicopter-drop/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unconditional basic income&lt;/a&gt;. But I realize that&#039;s not an incredibly popular position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you on students not being forced to subsidize this with tuition money. I think education should be free for everyone. I don&#8217;t pretend to have any answers about how to do that. They seemed to manage OK in Canada and the UK for a while, but that&#8217;s changing&#8230;</p>
<p>As for professors finding &#8220;someone willing to pay them to do research and write articles,&#8221; this is actually what we spend an enormous amount of time doing. In fact a common complaint among researchers is that we spend as much or more time writing grant proposals to fund research than actually doing research. If teaching were all done by adjuncts or via MOOCs, it would leave everyone in the position that those of us on &#8220;soft money,&#8221; already endure, i.e., constant pressure to raise funds with no job security. It is not exactly a situation that encourages careful contemplation or slow, laborious work on unpopular topics, but those are just the sorts of things that often produce unheralded breakthroughs, and anyway expand the boundaries of human knowledge. </p>
<p>As for subsidizing your mechanic&#8217;s time working on the hot rod, I am actually OK an indirect form of that called <a href="http://www.peterfrase.com/2011/09/the-basic-income-and-the-helicopter-drop/" rel="nofollow">unconditional basic income</a>. But I realize that&#8217;s not an incredibly popular position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by acs</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>acs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 03:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this insightful analysis.It is one of the best I have read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this insightful analysis.It is one of the best I have read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by DensityDuck</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>&quot;The story of MOOCs so far demonstrates that faculty will willingly work very hard for little else than the satisfaction of sharing their knowledge with thousands of students at a time...&quot;

Heck, we already knew that.  Wikipedia exists because internet users will willingly work very hard for little else than the satisfaction of sharing their knowledge with thousands of other internet users at a time.

&quot;[MOOCs] are likely to play an important role in devaluing and destroying one of the few humane and satisfying forms of employment left: teaching in exchange for time, freedom, and access to resources for scholarly activity as a university professor.&quot;

But why should &quot;time, freedom, and access to resources for scholarly activity&quot; be something that university students subsidize with their tuition?  Why do we have to have that fig-leaf of teaching?  &quot;Prof&#039;s never in his office and his grad student does all the lectures&quot; is not just a National Lampoon punchline.  Maybe if what the professors want is to do research and write articles, they should find someone willing to pay them to do research and write articles.  Tuning up a hot rod might be a humane and satisfying form of employment, but if my mechanic quotes nine hours to do a job and then spends eight of them tuning up his hot rod, then I &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; say &quot;I&#039;m happy to pay extra money if it supports his ability to engage in a human and satisfying form of employment&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The story of MOOCs so far demonstrates that faculty will willingly work very hard for little else than the satisfaction of sharing their knowledge with thousands of students at a time&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Heck, we already knew that.  Wikipedia exists because internet users will willingly work very hard for little else than the satisfaction of sharing their knowledge with thousands of other internet users at a time.</p>
<p>&#8220;[MOOCs] are likely to play an important role in devaluing and destroying one of the few humane and satisfying forms of employment left: teaching in exchange for time, freedom, and access to resources for scholarly activity as a university professor.&#8221;</p>
<p>But why should &#8220;time, freedom, and access to resources for scholarly activity&#8221; be something that university students subsidize with their tuition?  Why do we have to have that fig-leaf of teaching?  &#8220;Prof&#8217;s never in his office and his grad student does all the lectures&#8221; is not just a National Lampoon punchline.  Maybe if what the professors want is to do research and write articles, they should find someone willing to pay them to do research and write articles.  Tuning up a hot rod might be a humane and satisfying form of employment, but if my mechanic quotes nine hours to do a job and then spends eight of them tuning up his hot rod, then I <i>don&#8217;t</i> say &#8220;I&#8217;m happy to pay extra money if it supports his ability to engage in a human and satisfying form of employment&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOOCs as capital-biased technological change by SocraticGadfly</title>
		<link>http://themagnetisalwayson.com/moocs-as-capital-biased-technological-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>SocraticGadfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themagnetisalwayson.com/?p=532#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>If Clay Shirky is for it, I&#039;m agin it. Especially if he&#039;s taking his Gnu Media bullshit to the Gnu University.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Clay Shirky is for it, I&#8217;m agin it. Especially if he&#8217;s taking his Gnu Media bullshit to the Gnu University.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
